Synth pages
   Synth story
DIY modules
   A110 sine shape
A117 clock in
A127 LP/BP switch
A135 indiv outs
A140 self-cycle
A150 switch voltage
A151 2/3 steps
A155 16-steps
A161 clock in
A163 DC couple
IEC power inlet
Plan B summary
M9 bleed-through
M10 envelope
M11 filter
M14 crossfade
M15 sine adjust
M15 others
M17 timer
M28 upgrade
M32 joystick
M38A Expander
Diode Ladder Filters
Korg MS10/20 Filters
Moog paper refs
Fooled by SPICE
Filter pole animations
Serge VCS
EDP Gnat schematics
Old brochures
PE Synth/Minisonic
About me
Photo links
Purple Mountain
Contact details
What's new
Cheltenham Circular Footpath
The Trouble with Christmas
this night wounds time
Behold the Computer
Solartron scans

Site map

I have a Facebook page for occasional blog-like articles:

Tim Stinchcombe's Synth Stuff


[Whilst I lumped this page in with the others under 'modifications', there are no modifications here, just some observations.]

Plan B M11 Evil Twin Bandpass filter

The M11 page at the EAR Group website contained a lot of typically exaggerated jargon to talk up the filter (the original website went down years ago, but the Wayback Machine still has copies of the page). Some of the more flowery expressions are fair enough, being as the terms are subjective, but some of those having a more technical meaning are at best misleading, if not just plainly erroneous—here's an extract, my emphasis:

Discrete Component Core

Utilizing an all-discrete core comprising twice the vactrols found in the mellifluous Model 12, the Evil Twin's open architecture takes advantage of circuit nodes which would be buried inside op-amps of conventional filters: a capacitance-coupled Twin Feedback path which engages an aggressive yet stable distortion mode not available anywhere but the 11. Brought into the circuit via a switch, the Twin Feedback generates timbres normally reserved for tube-based distortion units

In turn:
     - all-discrete core: I count five op amps in the audio path, two of which are in the filter core itself—this surely does not qualify it as 'all-discrete'
- circuit nodes which would be buried inside op-amps: the filter consists of a couple of JFET buffers, some fixed- and variable-gain op amp set-ups, and caps and resistors and some feedback paths—I see nothing that would readily identify itself as being an 'internal node' of an op amp to which this statement might apply
- Twin Feedback path: it is what this is which is the main purpose of this page.

On tracing out the circuit of the M11 its roots in the Buchla 291 are very evident—the filter core is pretty much a straight copy, with a handful of component value changes, and one extra component, empirically chosen to seemingly 'pep it up'. It is also plain to see that the above statement about the 'twin feedback path' is erroneous, as the 'single/twin' switch merely connects an attenuated amount of the input audio signal through to the main frequency controlling sub-circuit: it is tempting to call this 'feed forward', but even the use of that term may not be completely rigorous, as the signal concerned doesn't actually feed in directly again to the downstream version of the audio signal—however, feedback it most certainly isn't. At the time I thought that this being the case, it might be interesting to see if one could sensibly 'emulate' this feature of the circuit by external patching, and recently I have made just such an attempt.

Simple calculation showed that when the 'level' pot is set at max and the switch is at 'twin', the input audio signal is attenuated by about ×0.25 ≡ −12dB at the point where it enters the frequency CV circuit; furthermore there is a capacitor in the path, giving a highpass effect with a 3dB frequency of about 25Hz, so any input signals in my attempt (which was not going to incorporate such a capacitor) ought to be significantly above this frequency in order to not fall foul of unwanted attenuation. Signals input at the 'FM in' input are subjected to a small gain in the CV circuit (when the associated pot is set to maximum), and so the attenuation of any external signal would need to be in the region of ×0.17 to replicate the full internal attenuation. (All of these figures were double-checked via SPICE simulation.)

This diagram shows the equivalence, that an M11 operating in 'twin' mode is essentially the same as running in 'single' with an attenuated version of the audio signal feeding the 'FM in':

( The '×0.17' gain triangle could be implemented by the likes of a Doepfer A-138 mixer; the 'of suitable amplitude' is just to emphasize that the 'level' input pot needs to be fully clockwise, and so any desired attenuation of the input signal, to prevent distortion etc., needs to be external to the M11.)

I decided to use a patch which had a striking difference whilst flipping the switch between 'single' and 'twin', so as to be sure that the so-called 'twin feedback path' was having a significant effect—what I came up with was a PWMed square wave fed into the filter, with a low frequency cut-off. Here is the sound file of the clip I recorded—the sequence in the file is:

     - a few seconds with the switch in 'single'
- a few seconds in 'twin'
- then back to single
- a few seconds of the 'emulated twin', using the alternate patch
- then normal twin again
- then emulated twin to finish (there's a small 'blip' between the last two changes).

In the patch the filter seems fairly tame when run in 'single', but when in 'twin' it is much more lively (mainly because both the bandwidth and resonance pots are almost at full), and as can be heard, and as expected, the change between the proper 'twin' operation and the 'emulated' one isn't that great, effectively proving the point about what the 'twin' operation really is—the defining feature of the module is no more than audio-rate modulation of the cut-off frequency (albeit with the extra tweaks to the filter—over the 291—'maxed out'). (The actual attenuation needed was a little less than 0.17—measured at 0.22—but I later realised that I hadn't kept the input frequency as high as I needed to avoid the attenuation from the cap in the 'FM in' input path, and this could well account for the difference.)

(The full patch was:

     - M15 #2 set at 21.4Hz; tri out via A-138 #2 to give 2.46V pk-to-pk into M15 #1 PWM input
- M15 #1 running at 55.3Hz; PWM in from 138 #2; PWM knob roughly 4.5; square out feeds M11 and A-138 #1
- A-138 #1 attenuating M15 #1 square by about 0.2; feeds A-150, and thence to M11 FM in
- M11: M15 #1 square out to In, level pot fully CW; 138 #1 out (via 150) to FM in, pot fully CW; Frequency pot approx 2.2; Bandwidth pot approx 7.8; resonance almost fully CW; 12dB output is recorded.
VCS A-150 is switched using a simple CV source, so it was possible to either switch between 'single' and 'twin' normally (whilst 150 off), or flip the toggle and switch the 150 on simultaneously, so as go between 'twin' and 'emulated twin' in one movement, as is done at the end of the sequence.)

[Page last updated: 03 Jan 2015]